Massachusetts Appeals Court· 8/16/1996
Doe v. Nutter, McClennen & Fish
Citations
- 41 Mass. App. Ct. 137
- 668 N.E.2d 1329
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal of chapter 93A claim and other state law claims based on litigation privilege
- explaining privilege applies even if “offensive statements are uttered maliciously or in bad faith”
- letter in which firm threatened to bring law suit against plaintiff protected by absolute privilege could not form basis of liability on any theory
- “the disciplinary rules provide standards of professional conduct of attorneys and do not in and of themselves create independent causes of action”
- privilege protects against invasion of privacy and violations of Civil Rights Act and G. L. c. 93A
- attorney furnished with case law demonstrating that no cause of action existed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Porada
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-01-22· cited 195×
- Fisher v. LintMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-06-19· cited 54×
- Van Christo Advertising, Inc. v. M/A-COM/LCSMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-01-12· cited 46×
- Bartle v. BerryMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-09-14· cited 43×
- In re CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-12-08· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. Vao SokMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-02-01· cited 27×
- McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.D. Massachusetts· 2012-11-20· cited 27×
- Taylor v. SwartwoutD. Massachusetts· 2006-07-24· cited 23×
- Anderson v. Boston School CommitteeFirst Circuit· 1997-02-04· cited 20×
- Visnick v. CaulfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-03-10· cited 15×
- International Floor Crafts, Inc. v. AdamsD. Massachusetts· 2007-02-28· cited 13×
- Psy-Ed Corp. v. KleinMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-09-23· cited 12×
- Meltzer v. GrantD. Massachusetts· 2002-03-28· cited 10×
- Korper v. WeinsteinMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-02-24· cited 10×
- Bratcher v. Moriarty, Donoghue & Leja, P.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-03-04· cited 9×
- Telman v. BrinkMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-08-18· cited 8×
- Northeast Line Construction Corp. v. J.E. Guertin Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-10-13· cited 8×
- Noone v. Town of PalmerD. Massachusetts· 2014-02-26· cited 8×
- Taupa Lithuanian Federal Credit Union v. BajerciusMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1997-03-11· cited 8×
- Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. v. PorroD. Massachusetts· 2014-09-30· cited 5×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Correllas v. ViveirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-06-05· cited 253×
- Fishman v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-01-30· cited 178×
- Kevin Frazier v. Edward N. BaileyFirst Circuit· 1992-02-24· cited 177×
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonSecond Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 166×
- CRIBERG v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-04-08· cited 125×
- Robert L. Sullivan, D.D.S., P.C. v. BirminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-02-13· cited 88×
- Mulgrew v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-07-11· cited 69×
- New England Allbank for Savings v. RouleauMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-12-06· cited 28×
- Bird v. BirdMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-06-22· cited 20×
- Theran v. RokoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-11-03· cited 13×
- Robinson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1989-12-22· cited 12×
- Callahan v. Board of Bar OverseersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-04-12· cited 11×
- Committe v. Dennis Reimer Co.D. Vermont· 1993-08-10· cited 8×
- Fifty-One Hispanic Residents v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-01-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.