Callahan v. Board of Bar Overseers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing double appellate costs where record was “rife with irrelevant, confusing, repetitive, and inflammatory [materials]” and counsel “set[] forth arguments on which ... a reasonable competent attorney could not hope to prevail”
• imposing double appellate costs where counsel’s submissions were “convoluted, difficult to understand . . . [and] rife with the same kind of ‘inflammatory and confusing accusations of conspiracy, fraud and bad faith’ that [the court] previously found to be frivolous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).