Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/25/2001
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Batson
Citations
- 548 S.E.2d 854
- 345 S.C. 316
- 2001 S.C. LEXIS 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “a party opposing summary judgment [must] come forward with affidavits or other supporting documents demonstrating the existence of a genuine issue for trial”
- stating that a party opposing summary judgment is required to come forward with affidavits or other supporting documents demonstrating the existence of a genuine issue for trial
- An essential element in a cause of action for negligence is the existence of a legal duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, MacAulay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grier v. Amisub of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-05-02· cited 50×
- Houck v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-09-26· cited 41×
- Doe v. Greenville County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-08-27· cited 37×
- Huggins v. Citibank, N.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-08-11· cited 36×
- Schmidt v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-12-22· cited 34×
- State of Iowa v. Christopher Raymond LindellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-03-08· cited 28×
- BPS, INC. v. WorthyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-10· cited 27×
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. MarionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-10-25· cited 24×
- Montgomery v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-12-06· cited 15×
- Hoard Ex Rel. Hoard v. Roper Hosp., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-05-03· cited 15×
- Roe v. BibbyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-10-01· cited 13×
- Wallace v. DayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-29· cited 11×
- Thomas Sand Co. v. Colonial Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 10×
- Peterson v. PorterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-29· cited 7×
- Lawing v. Trinity Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-08-21· cited 4×
- Trotter v. TRANE COIL FACILITYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-12· cited 3×
- Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-12-21· cited 1×
- Wallace v. DayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-16
- Covil Corporation v. Pennsylvania National Mutual CasualtyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-01-05
- Bank of North Carolina v. BouscarenD. South Carolina· 2014-12-09
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-13· cited 261×
- J.S. v. R.T.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-07-29· cited 117×
- Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 111×
- Kleckley v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 37×
- Black v. Lexington School District No. 2Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-21· cited 31×
- Washington v. Lexington County JailCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-11· cited 29×
- Doe v. BatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.