Skip to main content
· 1/5/2022

Covil Corporation v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty

Syllabus

ovil Corporation, by and through its duly appointed Receiver, Peter D. Protopapas (Covil), filed this action against Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (Penn) alleging breach of insurance contracts based on Penn's failure to participate in the settlement of an underlying claim against Covil. Penn appeals the circuit court's order granting partial summary judgment to Covil, arguing the court erred in (1) granting partial summary judgment where Covil's motion was not supported by sworn affidavits and summary judgment was premature (2) finding Covil's late notice of the underlying claim did not bar coverage and (3) holding coverage existed despite a products hazard and operations hazard exclusion in the Penn insurance contracts. We affirm.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.