Wallace v. Day

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the grant of summary judgment when the parties offered competing interpretations of a lease, even though neither party asserted the lease was ambiguous
• determining the terms of the contract were \reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation\ and holding \the determination of the parties' intent at the time they executed the contract is a question of fact that should not have been decided on summary judgment\
• \The issue of a contract's interpretation necessarily subsumes the primary question of whether the contract's language is clear or ambiguous . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).