Dluhos v. Strasberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “apply[ing] the applicable law, irrespective of whether the pro se litigant has mentioned it by name,” on a motion to dismiss
• “apply[ing] the applicable law, irrespective of whether the pro se litigant has mentioned it by name,” on a motion to dismiss
• stating the general rule that courts are to liberally construe pro se litigants’ pleadings
• “[W]e must liberally construe the [pro se] litigant’s pleadings, and we will apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether he has mentioned it by name.”
• “[W]e must liberally construe the prose litigant’s pleadings, and we will apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether he has mentioned it by name.”
• “[W]e will apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether [the pro se litigant] has mentioned it by name.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Bergerud
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2010-01-11· cited 1,379×
• Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. Bacon
  Fifth Circuit· 2009-03-18· cited 188×
• Antonio Pearson v. Secretary Department of Correc
  Third Circuit· 2015-01-07· cited 158×
• Judith Goldman v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc
  Third Circuit· 2016-08-22· cited 91×
• Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 27 v. E.P. Donnelly, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2013-12-13· cited 72×
• In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2005-03-09· cited 55×
• Bush v. City of Philadelphia Philadelphia Police Department
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-02-04· cited 30×
• Hamilton Park Health Care Center Ltd. v. 1199 Seiu United Healthcare Workers East
  Third Circuit· 2016-04-01· cited 29×
• Ostroff v. Alterra Healthcare Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-06-07· cited 28×
• Todd France v. Jason Bernstein
  Third Circuit· 2022-08-09· cited 23×
• Benn v. Universal Health System, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2004-06-17· cited 19×
• In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative
  S.D. Texas· 2005-08-01· cited 17×
• Southco, Inc. v. Reell Precision Manufacturing Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-05-27· cited 8×
• Fox International Relations v. Fiserv Securities, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-03-08· cited 8×
• McCauley v. Computer Aid Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-08-25· cited 7×
• The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Allen Charles BERGERUD
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2010-01-11· cited 3×
• Barclay v. Amtrak
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-11-08· cited 2×
• Metromedia Energy, Inc. v. Enserch Energy Services, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2005-06-02· cited 2×
• Caldwell v. CVS Corp.
  D. New Jersey· 2006-08-10· cited 1×
• Parker v. Viacom International, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-03-11

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
• Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 1,312×
• Dluhos v. Strasberg
  Third Circuit· 2003-02-20· cited 265×
• Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., Appellee
  First Circuit· 1994-06-29· cited 229×
• Higgins v. Beyer
  Third Circuit· 2002-06-12· cited 219×
• Harris v. City of Philadelphia
  Third Circuit· 1994-09-29· cited 155×
• United States v. Bankers Insurance Company
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-03-27· cited 115×
• Roadway Package System, Inc. v. Scott Kayser D/B/A Quality Express Scott Kayser
  Third Circuit· 2001-06-07· cited 113×
• Fannie Harrison v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.
  Third Circuit· 1997-04-15· cited 73×
• AMF INC. v. Brunswick Corp.
  E.D. New York· 1985-11-04· cited 48×
• Sallen v. Corinthians Licenciamentos LTDA
  First Circuit· 2001-12-05· cited 45×
• Parisi v. Netlearning, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2001-05-10· cited 19×
• Local 863 Intl. Broth v. Jersey Coast Egg Prod
  Third Circuit· 1985-09-25· cited 7×