Higgins v. Beyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court must “apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether the pro se litigant mentioned it by name” (internal quotation omitted)
• suggesting that a pre-deprivation hearing might have prevented prison administrators from improperly seizing VA benefits
• concluding “that § 5301(a) provides a federal right that is enforceable under § 1983”
• explaining that a court will liberally construe pro se claims and “apply the applicable law, irrespective of whether the pro se litigant mentioned it by name.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• Veterans Administration disability benefits are not subject to deduction to satisfy criminal fines
• in reviewing a dismissal for failure to state claim, the Court of Appeals must interpret a pro se plaintiff’s complaint liberally and apply the applicable law even if the plaintiff has not mentioned it by name

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).