Skip to main content
· 5/10/2001

Parisi v. Netlearning, Inc.

Citations

  • 139 F. Supp. 2d 745
  • 59 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1051
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9588
  • 2001 WL 503004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that UDRP proceedings should not receive the significant deference accorded to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act
  • stating that “courts have liberally construed that term [arbitration] to encompass various diverse dispute- settlement mechanisms”
  • “Aggrieved parties may not circumvent the FAA by packaging a motion to vacate as a fresh complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brinkema

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.