Benn v. Universal Health System, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]rivate misuse of a state statute does not describe conduct that can be attributed to the State.”
• expert affidavit opining that mental healthcare professionals acted with gross negligence in recommending involuntary civil commitment did not preclude court from deciding, as a matter of law, that no reasonable jury could find that the doctors were grossly negligent
• referring to the Brentwood Academy considerations as “factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).