· 7/8/2010

District Lodge 26 v. United Technologies Corp.

Citations

610 F.3d 44
188 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3025
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “the interpretation of an ambiguous contract provision is a question for the finder of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Sack, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.