Parker v. Motors Liquidation Co. (In Re Motors Liquidation Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that equitable mootness has been applied when a reorganization is “substantially consummated” and when an unstayed order has resulted in a “comprehensive change in circumstances” (citation omitted)
• finding the sale was not a sub rosa plan where it did not “specifically dictate, or arrange ex ante, by contract, the terms of any subsequent plan.”
• “The Bankruptcy Court’s finding of good faith ... is either a factual question or mixed question of fact and law that must be reviewed for clear error.”
• “Indeed, by definition, an unsecured creditor has no particularized property interest in the Debtors’ estates.”
• per curiam, Jacobs, CJ, and Hall and Carney, JJ.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).