Second Circuit· 5/30/2019
Kidd v. Thomson Reuters Corp.
Citations
- 925 F.3d 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Thompson Reuters was not acting as a “consumer reporting agency” by furnishing criminal background information
- finding that an entity must have the specific intent to provide a “consumer report”
- characterizing consumer reporting agencies as entities that “sell consumer reports to lenders, credit card companies, insurers, and employers for credit, insurance and employment decisions”
- listing examples of consumer reporting agencies as: Equifax, Transunion, and Experian
- “Thomson Reuters . . . acknowledges that it is regulated by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act . . . .”
- “A ‘consumer reporting agency’ is an entity that intends the information it furnishes to constitute a ‘consumer report.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calabresi, Droney, Underhill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- D.S. v. Trumbull Bd. of Ed.Second Circuit· 2020-09-17· cited 11×
- Richard Zabriskie v. fnma/fannie MaeNinth Circuit· 2019-10-08
- New York v. United States Dep't of JusticeSecond Circuit· 2020-02-26
- Hackett v. TD Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Delaware· 2023-05-31
- United States v. David PaitselD.C. Circuit· 2025-08-01
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court· 2009-06-29· cited 1,988×
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 1,333×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2012-05-21· cited 575×
- Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-06-01· cited 294×
- Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement FundSupreme Court· 2018-03-20· cited 129×
- Carolyn Denise Irby v. New York City Transit Authority (m.a.b.s.t.o.a.)Second Circuit· 2001-08-22· cited 87×
- Caro v. WeintraubSecond Circuit· 2010-08-13· cited 86×
- District Lodge 26 v. United Technologies Corp.Second Circuit· 2010-07-08· cited 46×
- Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp.Supreme Court· 2017-02-22· cited 35×
- United States v. Technodyne LLCSecond Circuit· 2014-06-03· cited 29×
- Tierney v. Advocate Health & Hospitals Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2015-08-10· cited 16×
- Kidd v. Thomson Reuters Corp.S.D. Illinois· 2017-10-26· cited 11×
- Richard Zabriskie v. fnma/fannie MaeNinth Circuit· 2019-01-09· cited 8×
- Williams v. Wilmington Trust CompanySecond Circuit· 2003-09-25· cited 5×
Other cases named Kidd v. Thomson Reuters Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.