Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 5/30/2019

Kidd v. Thomson Reuters Corp.

Citations

  • 925 F.3d 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Thompson Reuters was not acting as a “consumer reporting agency” by furnishing criminal background information
  • finding that an entity must have the specific intent to provide a “consumer report”
  • characterizing consumer reporting agencies as entities that “sell consumer reports to lenders, credit card companies, insurers, and employers for credit, insurance and employment decisions”
  • listing examples of consumer reporting agencies as: Equifax, Transunion, and Experian
  • “Thomson Reuters . . . acknowledges that it is regulated by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act . . . .”
  • “A ‘consumer reporting agency’ is an entity that intends the information it furnishes to constitute a ‘consumer report.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Droney, Underhill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kidd v. Thomson Reuters Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.