Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a request for a 227 store search in twenty states over a five-year period was overly broad
• holding that request for Dillard to perform a search for documents covering a five-year time period and twenty states was overly broad as a matter of law
• providing that the scope of discovery is largely within the discretion of the trial court
• stating that a 227 store search in twenty states for documents over a five-year period was overly broad
• stating that a request requiring a 227-store search in twenty states for documents over a five-year period was overly broad
• stating that a request requiring a 227-store search in twenty states for documents over a five-year period was overly broad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).