In Re TIG Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that parties may proceed under Rule 193.3 when the record showed the issue of attorney work product was not properly before trial court
• noting that the burden to propound discovery requests that comply with the rules of discovery should be on the party propounding the discovery, not the courts
• issue of attorney work product not properly before trial court where neither party addressed the privilege at the hearing and the parties had not yet followed procedures under Rule 193.3
• “The burden to propound discovery complying with the rules of discovery should be on the party propounding the discovery, and not on the courts to redraft overly broad discovery . . . .”
• “Requests must be tailored to include only matters relevant to the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).