Skip to main content
· 10/3/2003

In Re CSX Corp.

Citations

  • 124 S.W.3d 149
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 24
  • 2003 Tex. LEXIS 414
  • 2003 WL 22272604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that relator lacked adequate remedy by appeal where discovery order compelled production of “patently irrelevant” documents
  • holding relator lacked adequate remedy by appeal where discovery order compelled production of \patently irrelevant\ documents
  • holding relator lacked adequate remedy by appeal where discovery order compelled production of “patently irrelevant” documents
  • stating that request to identify all safety employees who worked for defendant over a thirty-year period qualifies as a “fishing expedition”
  • explaining that an abuse of discretion occurs when the discovery ordered “exceeds that permitted by the rules of procedure”
  • holding relator lacked adequate remedy by appeal where discovery order compelled production of “patently irrelevant” documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.