· 8/17/2009
Digital Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Moreno (In Re Moreno)
Citations
- 414 B.R. 485
- 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2916
- 2009 WL 2948482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an unsigned minute entry was a final judgment for purposes of issue preclusion even if the judgment was not appealable because the judgment was unsigned
- “Stated differently, embezzlement is proven by demonstrating that ‘(1) the debtor appropriated funds for his or her own benefit; and (2) the debtor did so with fraudulent intent or deceit.’”
- explaining difference between embezzlement and larceny
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert D. Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.