Skip to main content
· 8/17/2009

Digital Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Moreno (In Re Moreno)

Citations

  • 414 B.R. 485
  • 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2916
  • 2009 WL 2948482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an unsigned minute entry was a final judgment for purposes of issue preclusion even if the judgment was not appealable because the judgment was unsigned
  • “Stated differently, embezzlement is proven by demonstrating that ‘(1) the debtor appropriated funds for his or her own benefit; and (2) the debtor did so with fraudulent intent or deceit.’”
  • explaining difference between embezzlement and larceny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert D. Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.