Skip to main content
· 11/12/1991

Rourk v. State

Citations

  • 821 P.2d 273
  • 170 Ariz. 6
  • 99 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
  • 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that doctrine of parental immunity did not apply to foster parents
  • describing actions of a state agency that seem to have been taken by multiple employees and describing what the agency knew or should have known based on the aggregate actions of those employees
  • finding accident caused by intoxicated driver part of foreseeable chain of events even though exact details of driver’s conduct not foreseeable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kleinschmidt, Brooks, Lankford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.