Federal Trade Commission v. Abeyta (In Re Abeyta)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying collateral estoppel and holding that a finding of reckless indifference under Section 5 of the FTC Act is sufficient to satisfy the intent requirement under Section 523(a)(2)(A), given the “facts and circumstances established” in the underlying action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).