Skip to main content

Dickerson v. State

Citations

  • 866 S.W.2d 696
  • 1993 Tex. App. LEXIS 3014
  • 1993 WL 459906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony of officer who saw defendant holding crack pipe was sufficient to affirmatively link defendant to the contraband
  • holding that testimony of officer who saw defendant holding crack pipe was sufficient to affirmatively link defendant to the contraband
  • holding that testimony of officer who saw defendant holding crack pipe was sufficient to affirmatively link defendant to the contraband
  • to preserve error in the admission of evidence, a party must continue to object each time the inadmissible evidence is offered
  • to preserve error in the admission of evidence, a party must continue to object each time the inadmissible evidence is offered
  • requiring objection each time improper argument is made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver-Parrott, O'Connor, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.