Skip to main content
· 5/3/2001

Nemirovsky v. Nemirovsky

Citations

  • 776 A.2d 988
  • 2001 Pa. Super. 137
  • 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 545
  • 2001 WL 460900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an unsecured creditor does not have a sufficient property interest to permit it to intervene
  • holding waiver applied to “cursory, four sentence argument” unsupported by citation to case law
  • issue waived where appellant offered only a cursory argument and failed to cite any legal authority to support his contention.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Todd, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.