Devine v. Fusaro
Citations
- 197 Conn. App. 872
Syllabus
The plaintiff administrator of the estate of the decedent, D, sought to recover damages from the defendants, four members of the tactical unit of the State Police, for the wrongful death of D following his suicide after a standoff with law enforcement on certain public property in Groton. The plaintiff's complaint alleged that, in response to a Groton police captain's request for the assistance of the tactical unit, the defendants arrived at the scene of the standoff, and, after several hours of unsuccess- ful negotiations with D, who was suicidal and armed with a handgun, they used less than lethal ammunition on him. D then shot himself in the head and died as a result of the gunshot. The trial court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. In reaching its decision, the court determined that the wrongful death action, as alleged in the complaint, satisfied the four criteria of the test set forth in Spring v. Constantino (168 Conn. 563), and, therefore, it was brought against the defendants in their official, rather than individual, capacities. On the plaintiff's appeal to this court, held that the trial court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's action on the ground of sovereign immunity: contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the four criteria of the Spring test were satisfied, and, therefore, the defendants were sued in their official, rather than their individual, capacities, as the defendants were state officials, the action against them concerned a matter in which they were representing the state and acting in the scope of their official police duties, the state was the real party in interest because the damages sought by the plaintiff were premised entirely on injuries alleged to have been caused by the official acts of the defendants, and a judgment against the defendants would impact how the State Police, and especially members of the tactical uni
Judges: DiPentima; Keller; Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-08-12· cited 220×
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-06-10· cited 126×
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-11· cited 68×
- Columbia Air Services, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-09-08· cited 67×
- Somers v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-06-12· cited 51×
- Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-02-22· cited 30×
- Sullins v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-30· cited 25×
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-24· cited 23×
- State v. WelwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-16· cited 18×
- Kenney v. WeavingConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-08-10· cited 9×
- Kelly v. AlbertsenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-05-26· cited 6×
- Macellaio v. Newington Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-23· cited 6×
- Cimmino v. MarcocciaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-04-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.