Cimmino v. Marcoccia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that second criterion of Spring test was met because defendants were ‘‘acting in furtherance of a joint investigation authorized by statute and initiated by the state agencies that employed them’’
• fourth prong satisfied because any judgment against defendants would impact manner in which state officials conduct investigations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).