Sullins v. Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, although valid federal laws generally may be enforced in state courts, when construing scope of federal law that encroaches on state's sovereign immunity, federal law and principles control our analysis
• observing that, although valid federal laws generally may be enforced in state courts, when construing scope of federal law that encroaches on state’s sovereign immunity, federal law and principles control our analysis
• ‘‘State courts have concurrent jurisdiction over claims brought 15 We note that the standard for determining damages pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 (k
• ‘‘test set forth in Spring . . . is an appropriate mechanism . . . to determine the capacity in which the named defendants are sued in actions asserting violations of state law’’
• ‘‘test set forth in Spring . . . is an appropriate mecha- nism . . . to determine the capacity in which the named defendants are sued in actions asserting viola- tions of state law’’
• defendants pleaded special defense of qualified immunity in answer to complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).