· 5/26/2009
Kelly v. Albertsen
Citations
- 970 A.2d 787
- 114 Conn. App. 600
- 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff not entitled to limited discovery and evidentiary hearing to meet burden of alleging facts that demonstrate subject matter jurisdiction in civil action against state employee, but this court suggested that plaintiff could have used bill of discovery
- ‘‘[a]s soon as the jurisdic- tion of the court to decide an issue is called into ques- tion, all other action in the case must come to a halt until such a determination is made’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: DiPENTIMA, DiPentima, Gruendel, Schaller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.