Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 3/29/2006
Depot v. Depot
Citations
- 2006 ME 25
- 893 A.2d 995
- 2006 Me. LEXIS 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a trial judge “may not assign a lump sum value to Social Security benefits and either transfer or offset those benefits when exercising its [statutory] authority to divide marital property”
- stating that a trial judge “may not assign a lump sum value to Social Security benefits and either transfer or offset those benefits when exercising its [statutory] authority to divide marital property”
- “Failing to consider Social Security benefit payments a spouse can reasonably be expected to receive in the near future may result in a distorted picture of that spouse’s financial needs, and, in turn, an inequitable division of the marital property.”
- “Failing to consider Social Security benefit payments a spouse can reasonably be expected to receive in the near future may result in a distorted picture of that spouse’s financial needs, and, in turn, an inequitable division of the marital property.”
- “Congress has specifically excluded any similar payment obligation arising from any community property settlement, equitable distribution of property, or other division of property between spouses or former spouses.”
- “A divorce court’s consideration of a spouse’s anticipated or actual Social Security benefit payments as a relevant factor ... does not represent a transfer or assignment ... in violation of the Social Security Act’s anti-assignment provision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saufley, Clifford, Dana, Alexander, Calkins, Levy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Youngbluth v. YoungbluthSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-05-28· cited 33×
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-07-10· cited 33×
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 29×
- Dunmore v. DunmoreAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-05-11· cited 15×
- Biondo v. BiondoMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-03-15· cited 15×
- In re the Marriage of HeraldOregon Supreme Court· 2014-03-20· cited 12×
- Marriage of PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-01-11· cited 11×
- Burnell v. BurnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-02-28· cited 10×
- Olsen v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-09-13· cited 9×
- Stanley v. StanleySupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-04· cited 7×
- Jackson v. SollieCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-19· cited 6×
- Manning v. SchultzSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-02-21· cited 5×
- Bradbury v. BradburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-03-29· cited 5×
- Skibinski v. SkibinskiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-02-10· cited 4×
- John J. Monahan Jr. v. Judith B. MonahanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2015-05-14· cited 2×
- Tracy Diane Danielson v. Christopher John DanielsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2024-09-11
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 1,508×
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
- Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court· 1937-06-01· cited 473×
- Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 422×
- In Re the Marriage of MorehouseColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-02-24· cited 288×
- Neville v. NevilleOhio Supreme Court· 2003-07-23· cited 156×
- In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 103×
- In re the Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 97×
- Wolff v. WolffNevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 65×
- In Re Marriage of CrookIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 56×
- Matter of Marriage of Swan and SwanOregon Supreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 46×
- Mahoney v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-14· cited 45×
- In Re the Marriage of BoyerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-09-20· cited 41×
- Pongonis v. PongonisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-04-22· cited 41×
- Kelly v. KellyArizona Supreme Court· 2000-10-11· cited 41×
- In Re the Marriage of BraneCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-12-15· cited 25×
- Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-11-18· cited 25×
- Spooner v. SpoonerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-05-28· cited 23×
- Lanier v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-01-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.