South Dakota Supreme Court· 6/20/2007
Johnson v. Johnson
Citations
- 2007 SD 56
- 734 N.W.2d 801
- 2007 S.D. LEXIS 96
- 2007 WL 1792510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging “our deferential standard of review obviously came into play” after discussing cases involving personal injury awards in the -11- #30884 context of divorce proceedings
- “[A] court may premise an unequal distribution of marital property on the fact that one party is likely to receive or, in this case, is receiving social security benefits.”
- “[A] court may premise an unequal distribution of marital property on the fact that one party is likely to receive or, in this case, is receiving social security benefits.”
- “[The consideration] recognizes and compensates for the inequity of including all of [one party’s] CSRS benefits in the marital estate while [the other party’s] social security benefits are entirely excluded.”
- trial court properly found preseparation dissipation
- identifying states that permit an indirect offset
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilbertson, Sabers, Konenkamp, Zinter, Meierhenry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-07-10· cited 33×
- Hill v. HillSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-03-18· cited 30×
- Terca v. TercaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-10-22· cited 24×
- Taylor v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-05-15· cited 14×
- Halbersma v. HALBERSMASouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-11-10· cited 13×
- Marriage of PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-01-11· cited 11×
- Olsen v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2007-09-13· cited 9×
- Ahrendt v. ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-04-11· cited 8×
- Stanley v. StanleySupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-04· cited 7×
- Jackson v. SollieCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-19· cited 6×
- Inniss v. InnissSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-08-18· cited 6×
- Richarz v. RicharzSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-11-08· cited 5×
- Giesen v. GiesenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-04-25· cited 5×
- In re Marriage of MuellerIllinois Supreme Court· 2015-07-23· cited 4×
- Clark v. ClarkSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-07-02· cited 3×
- Smith v. SmithMontana Supreme Court· 2015-09-01· cited 3×
- Conti v. ContiSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-11-03· cited 3×
- Orr v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-06-29· cited 2×
- Osdoba v. Kelley-OsdobaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-06-06
- King v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-11-19
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
- In Re the Marriage of MorehouseColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-02-24· cited 288×
- Neville v. NevilleOhio Supreme Court· 2003-07-23· cited 156×
- In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 103×
- In re the Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 97×
- Parde v. PardeNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-11-12· cited 89×
- Webster v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-06-16· cited 79×
- Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 73×
- Wolff v. WolffNevada Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 65×
- Grode v. GrodeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 64×
- Cornbleth v. CornblethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-06· cited 61×
- In Re Marriage of CrookIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 56×
- Matter of Marriage of Swan and SwanOregon Supreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 46×
- Mahoney v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-14· cited 45×
- In Re the Marriage of BoyerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-09-20· cited 41×
- Kelly v. KellyArizona Supreme Court· 2000-10-11· cited 41×
- DeVries v. DeVriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-07-06· cited 34×
- Henrichs v. HenrichsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 31×
- Midzak v. MidzakSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-05-11· cited 29×
- In Re the Marriage of BraneCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-12-15· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.