Skip to main content

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2007 SD 56
  • 734 N.W.2d 801
  • 2007 S.D. LEXIS 96
  • 2007 WL 1792510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging “our deferential standard of review obviously came into play” after discussing cases involving personal injury awards in the -11- #30884 context of divorce proceedings
  • “[A] court may premise an unequal distribution of marital property on the fact that one party is likely to receive or, in this case, is receiving social security benefits.”
  • “[A] court may premise an unequal distribution of marital property on the fact that one party is likely to receive or, in this case, is receiving social security benefits.”
  • “[The consideration] recognizes and compensates for the inequity of including all of [one party’s] CSRS benefits in the marital estate while [the other party’s] social security benefits are entirely excluded.”
  • trial court properly found preseparation dissipation
  • identifying states that permit an indirect offset

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbertson, Sabers, Konenkamp, Zinter, Meierhenry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.