Lanier v. Lanier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting tier one Railroad Retirement benefits equivalent to Social Security benefits and illustrating how a court does not violate federal law when it considers expected railroad retirement benefits in assessing alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Depot v. Depot
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-03-29· cited 21×
• Stanley v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 6×
• Smelser v. Smelser
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-12-01· cited 5×
• Rabek v. Kellum
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-10-03· cited 2×
• M.M. v. T.M.
  New York Supreme Court· 2015-08-10· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCarty v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
• Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
• In Re the Marriage of Zappanti
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-06-19· cited 199×
• Spencer v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-11-21· cited 100×
• Pearson v. Pearson
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-07-21· cited 42×
• Clifton v. Clifton
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-09-09· cited 14×
• Kitchin v. Kitchin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1963-11-07· cited 14×
• Clary Appliance & Furniture Center, Inc. v. Butler
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-07-06· cited 11×
• Frost v. Frost
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-05-11· cited 9×
• Metzler v. Metzler
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-04-28· cited 7×
• Blue Cross of Georgia/Columbus, Inc. v. Whatley
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-06-27· cited 7×
• In Re Marriage of Flory
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-06-08· cited 6×
• Heidt v. Heidt
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1969-11-12· cited 5×
• Talutto v. Talutto
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-27· cited 1×