Dennis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because trial evidence was both direct and circumstantial, test to determine sufficiency of evidence was whether rational trier of fact could have found the essential element of malice aforethought beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Romano v. Gibson
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-02-13· cited 164×
• Romano v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-19· cited 159×
• Hung Thanh Le v. Mullin
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-11-26· cited 115×
• Warner v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-09-26· cited 112×
• Douglas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-12-17· cited 102×
• Dodd v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-10-21· cited 93×
• White v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-03-29· cited 57×
• Hill v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-05-19· cited 40×
• Dodd v. Trammell
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-09-16· cited 39×
• Gore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2005-08-30· cited 25×
• Duckett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-07-25· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spuehler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-12-02· cited 534×
• Woodruff v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-01-13· cited 146×
• Allen v. District Court of Washington County
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-01-09· cited 54×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-08-29· cited 33×
• Stover v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1984-01-06· cited 21×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-03-07· cited 19×
• McCaulley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-02-05· cited 18×