Skip to main content

Douglas v. State

Citations

  • 1997 OK CR 79
  • 951 P.2d 651
  • 69 O.B.A.J. 68
  • 1997 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 79
  • 1997 WL 771514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating attorney-client relationship insufficient, by itself, to show defendant authorized attorney to attempt to tamper with witness
  • execution of persons who were under 18 when they committed a crime violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
  • execution of persons who were under 18 when they committed a crime violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
  • “[W]e have reviewed the remaining comments not properly preserved and find no plain error.”
  • find lack of remorse is commonly used to prove the continuing threat aggravator
  • find lack of remorse is commonly used to prove the continuing threat aggravator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strubhar, Vice-Presiding, Lumpkin, Johnson, Chapel, Lane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.