Skip to main content
· 11/9/2004

Dell Computer Corp. v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 390 F.3d 377
  • 2004 WL 2504373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employment agreement was not continuing contract
  • noting that a court may consider circumstances present at the time a contract is exe- culed to determine if it is ambiguous but may not consider extrinsic evidence, such as parol evidence, to determine the “true meaning of the instrument”
  • “On a continuing contract, however, the statute of limitations does not commence to run until the contract is terminated or fully performed.”
  • “A renewed objection at trial is no longer required to preserve error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Wiener, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.