Skip to main content

Pitts & Collard, L.L.P. v. Schechter

Citations

  • 369 S.W.3d 301
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 10214
  • 2011 WL 6938515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating fact-finder is sole judge of credibility of witnesses and may choose to believe one witness over another
  • finding evidence sufficient to support verdict that plaintiff was first to breach
  • finding evidence factually sufficient to support $100,000 award for damage to reputation
  • “[P]arol evidence of the parties’ 27 intent is not admissible to vary the terms of an otherwise unambiguous instrument”
  • party waived complaint that jury’s award of no attorney’s fees was against great weight and preponderance of evidence by not filing motion for new trial
  • noting five ways to preserve no- evidence challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Massengale, Nuchia, Radack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

95 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.