Amigo Broadcasting, LP v. Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “criticism of the bases and sources” of an opinion affects the weight of an opinion, which “should be left for the jury’s consideration”
• holding that, under Texas law, “it is the burden of [the defendants], not [the plaintiff], to show that [the plaintiff] received a benefit from its expenditures that reduce or offset the amount of reliance damages to which [the plaintiff] claims it is enti- tled”
• affirming dismissal of claim for breach of license agreement in which party sought to recoup investment because “it did not produce any evidence that it made this investment in reliance on the license agreement”
• evidence that contract restricting employees’ use of their “names” may have referred to their “radio names” rather than their legal names could support finding that use of radio names breached the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).