Skip to main content

DeLeon v. State

Citations

  • 962 A.2d 383
  • 407 Md. 16
  • 2008 Md. LEXIS 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant waived an objection to what he claimed was irrelevant and highly prejudicial testimony about his purported gang affiliation because “evidence on the same point [was] admitted without objection” elsewhere at trial
  • noting that defendant waived in this Court evidentiary arguments on bases of relevancy and unfair prejudice where the record reflected that he raised at trial only an objection on grounds of improper foundation
  • noting that defendant waived in this Court evidentiary arguments on bases of relevancy and unfair prejudice where the record reflected that he raised at trial only an objection on grounds of improper foundation
  • “The determination of whether evidence is relevant is a matter of law, to be reviewed de novo by an appellate court.”
  • “The determination of whether evidence is relevant is a matter of law, to be reviewed de novo by an appellate court.” (Citation omitted)
  • “The determination of whether evidence is relevant is a matter of law, to be reviewed de novo by an appellate court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.