Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/8/2009
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 969 A.2d 262
- 408 Md. 204
- 2009 Md. LEXIS 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging rule that the state can introduce evidence to rehabilitate or rebut a witnesses testimony if the defense has opened the door during opening argument
- “A party basing an appeal on a ‘general’ objection to admission of certain evidence, may argue any ground against its inadmissibility.”
- \It is equally well settled that the State's case-in-chief may include 'rebuttal' evidence to which the defense has 'opened the door' ... during opening statement ...\
- a party basing an appeal on a “general” objection to admission of certain evidence, may argue any ground against its admissibility
- “An argumentative question is one which incorporates by assumption a fact not otherwise in evidence.” (internal quotations and citations omitted)
- “An argumentative question is one which incorporates by assumption a fact not otherwise in evidence.” (internal quotations and citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bazzle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-22· cited 48×
- Wilder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-25· cited 40×
- Alston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-11· cited 35×
- Hannah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-29· cited 20×
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-02-28· cited 20×
- Quansah v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 14×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-26· cited 12×
- Addison v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-02· cited 8×
- Paige v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-30· cited 7×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-13· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-28· cited 5×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-09-30· cited 4×
- Gupta v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-04-28· cited 4×
- Coryea Dominique Webster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-01-28· cited 3×
- Mohan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-02-02
- Cromartie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-04-28
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1996-03-18· cited 391×
- United States v. SaccocciaFirst Circuit· 1995-06-28· cited 281×
- United States v. Marva Headley, A/K/A \Brenda\Third Circuit· 1991-02-28· cited 277×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383Third Circuit· 1994-06-28· cited 207×
- In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 139×
- United States v. Funds in the Amount of Thirty Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars ($30,670.00), Antonio Calhoun, Claimant-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 2005-03-31· cited 130×
- State v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-18· cited 94×
- United States v. Six Hundred Thirty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty-Eight Dollars ($639,558) in United States CurrencyD.C. Circuit· 1992-02-07· cited 92×
- United States v. Fifty-Three Thousand Eighty-Two Dollars in United States Currency, $53,082.00, Gregory Brunson Willie W. Dixon, Claimants-AppelleesSixth Circuit· 1993-03-23· cited 88×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-10-05· cited 70×
- Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-07-06· cited 62×
- Leo Muhammed Antoinette Muhammed v. Drug Enforcement Agency, Asset Forfeiture UnitEighth Circuit· 1996-08-08· cited 56×
- Ragland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-18· cited 55×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 44×
- Smith v. State Roads Commission & State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-12-01· cited 42×
- United States v. $141,770.00 in United States Currency, Rafael Moreno-Pena, Claimant--AppellantEighth Circuit· 1998-12-21· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.