Skip to main content

Woodlin v. State

Citations

  • 484 Md. 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Armed with plausible interpretations supporting either side, we will not superimpose our judgment over the [circuit court’s] well-supported determination.” (citing State v. Matthews, 479 Md. 278, 305 (2022))
  • “Although we are satisfied that basic waiver principles resolve this issue, we cannot ignore the possibility that [the defendant’s] failure to make any such argument in the circuit court could have been a strategic trial decision.”
  • “[W]e neither add nor delete language so as to reflect an intent not evidenced in the plain and unambiguous language of the statute, and we do not construe a statute with forced or subtle interpretations that limit or extend its application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eaves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.