Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 4/23/2012

Deitz v. Ford (In Re Deitz)

Citations

  • 469 B.R. 11
  • 2012 WL 1497795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Stem does not preclude a bankruptcy court from liquidating a creditor’s claim through the non-dischargeability process
  • noting that “[determining the scope of the debtor’s discharge is a fundamental part of the bankruptcy process” and so is core (internal quotation omitted)
  • bankruptcy court can enter final judgment on underlying non-core claims that necessarily are part of adjudicating nondischargeability action
  • Ninth Circuit case not 4 binding precedent when it has been effectively superseded by an 5 intervening Supreme Court decision containing reasoning \clearly 6 irreconcilable\ with prior Ninth Circuit decision
  • interpreting 21 Stern v. Marshall, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011)
  • interpreting 21 Stern v. Marshall, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pappas, Dunn, Markell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.