In re Pegasus Gold Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that matters affecting “the implementation and execution of the Plan” fall under the court’s post-confirmation jurisdiction
• holding that bankruptcy court had post-confirmation jurisdiction over breach of contract claims based on alleged violations of plan provisions
• holding that courts have applied 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the supplemental jurisdiction 12 statute, to bankruptcy courts to allow them to resolve bankruptcy claims solely based on 13 “related to” jurisdiction
• recognizing that post-confirmation related to jurisdiction should be determined with “a certain flexibility”
• stating that bankruptcy courts have supplemental jurisdiction when a claim has a common nucleus of operative facts
• indicating that a “close nexus” to a confirmed bankruptcy plan exists if a matter affects “the interpretation, implementation, consummation, execution, or administration of the confirmed plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).