· 2/27/1998
Deisenroth v. Numonics Corp.
Citations
- 997 F. Supp. 153
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3199
- 1998 WL 117875
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting estoppel argument where plaintiff’s beguiling statements ended before the three-year limitations period expired
- statute of limitations defense not waived where defendant did not gull plaintiff by making representations regarding settlement throughout entire limitations period; discussions had ceased at least one year before expiration of three-year statute of limitations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.