Skip to main content
· 2/27/1998

Deisenroth v. Numonics Corp.

Citations

  • 997 F. Supp. 153
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3199
  • 1998 WL 117875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting estoppel argument where plaintiff’s beguiling statements ended before the three-year limitations period expired
  • statute of limitations defense not waived where defendant did not gull plaintiff by making representations regarding settlement throughout entire limitations period; discussions had ceased at least one year before expiration of three-year statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.