Skip to main content
· 8/17/1992

Robert P. Coyne v. City of Somerville

Citations

  • 972 F.2d 440
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 635
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18801
  • 1992 WL 197463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, under Rule 12(b)(6), courts \take the well-pleaded facts as they appear in the complaint\
  • noting that “property interests” normally wane as governmental regulation waxes
  • “violations of state law—even where arbitrary, capricious, or undertaken in bad 14 faith—do not, without more, give rise to a denial of substantive due process under the U.S. Constitution”
  • “[T]he ‘line between sufficient facts and insufficient conclusions is often blurred.’”
  • state teacher certification requirement does not confer a job \entitlement\ upon any particular applicant
  • \A plaintiff may not prevail simply by asserting an inequity and tacking on the self-serving conclusion that the defendant was motivated by a discriminatory animus.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.