Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a single bribe paid in three installments, each constituting a mail fraud violation, did not make out a \pattern\
• holding that a single bribe paid in three installments, each constituting a mail fraud violation, did not make out a \pattern\
• rejecting multiple scheme requirement; sufficient that predicates relate to one another and threaten to be more than an isolated occurrence
• rejecting multiple scheme requirement; sufficient that predicates relate to one another and threaten to be more than an isolated occurrence
• rejecting argument that information regarding alleged payment of bribes by corporate management may be \material\ only after indictment of wrongdoers
• determining whether a statement or omitted fact is material “requires delicate assessments of the inferences a reasonable [investor] would draw from a given set of facts and the significance of those inferences to him, and these assessments are peculiarly ones for the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).