Skip to main content
· 2/13/1997

Stanley v. CF-VH ASSOCIATES, INC.

Citations

  • 956 F. Supp. 55
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1587
  • 1997 WL 64196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Generally, a federal court in a diversity case applies the statute of limitations that would be applied by the forum state.”
  • interests “are necessarily related and should be evaluated ‘with some sensitivity’ to one another”
  • “if Gourdeau is construed as prospective only, most of its text would be superfluous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.