District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1/3/2008
DeGroot v. DeGroot
Citations
- 939 A.2d 664
- 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 2
- 2008 WL 41136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the statute’s six month residency requirement is jurisdictional in nature
- stating “a court may apply new laws to pending cases when those laws ‘speak to the power of the court’ ” (quoting Coto v. Citibank FSB, 912 A.2d 562, 566 n.4 (D.C. 2006)); State v. Barren, 279 P.3d 182, 185 (Nev. 2012
- “No case of this court suggests that subject matter jurisdiction to issue a [child] support order expires if all the parties have left the jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Fisher, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-20· cited 139×
- Richman Towers Tenants'ass'n, Inc. v. Richman Towers LLC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-04-14· cited 28×
- Upson v. WallaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-09-09· cited 17×
- Araya v. BaylyDistrict of Columbia· 2012-07-11· cited 15×
- Portuguese American Leadership Council of the United States, Inc. v. Investors' Alert, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-09-11· cited 13×
- Abulqasim v. MahmoudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-08-09· cited 13×
- In Re FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-22· cited 7×
- K.R. v. C.N.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-04-15· cited 4×
- Ieasha Hipps v. Ruben CabreraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-09-28· cited 2×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29· cited 1×
- Kr v. CnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-04-15
- Friedah v. FriedahOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-13
- State of Iowa v. Erin MackeSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-09-13
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,878×
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-12-15· cited 355×
- In Re the Marriage of HillstromColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-11-03· cited 305×
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-04-17· cited 91×
- LeTellier v. LeTellierTennessee Supreme Court· 2001-03-27· cited 66×
- Andrade v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-14· cited 61×
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-04-23· cited 53×
- Alves v. AlvesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1970-02-17· cited 49×
- Hamilton v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-12-15· cited 46×
- Jurado v. BrashearSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-03-19· cited 42×
- Groseth v. GrosethNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-08-20· cited 39×
- Zaabel v. KonetskiIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-03-11· cited 38×
- Linn v. Delaware Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-08-02· cited 34×
- Mims v. MimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-12-09· cited 32×
- Duvall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-16· cited 27×
- Rolinski v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-07-17· cited 23×
- Lunceford v. LuncefordMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-11-07· cited 21×
- Matthews v. Automated Business Systems & Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-24· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. RichterCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-09-17· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.