District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2/17/1970
Alves v. Alves
Citations
- 262 A.2d 111
- 51 A.L.R. 3d 213
- 1970 D.C. App. LEXIS 215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding husband established domicile for purposes of obtaining divorce in that jurisdiction, despite immigration status
- a British subject who held a non-immigrant visa under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a) (15)(G)(IV), renewable every two years, held, not precluded form obtaining domicile in District of Columbia
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hood, Chief Judge, and Fickling and Nebeker, Associate Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McHugh v. McHughSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-07-15· cited 101×
- Rozsnyai v. SvacekNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-11-09· cited 59×
- In Re Marriage of DickCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-04-26· cited 59×
- Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-12-07· cited 53×
- Rzeszotarski v. RzeszotarskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-10-31· cited 34×
- Bustamante v. BustamanteUtah Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 32×
- Mims v. MimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-12-09· cited 32×
- Rice v. RiceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-05-30· cited 31×
- Moreno v. University of MarylandD. Maryland· 1976-07-13· cited 30×
- Webster v. Hope (In Re Hope)District of Columbia· 1999-03-03· cited 27×
- Spencer v. SpencerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-06-26· cited 20×
- Beckwith v. BeckwithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-04-01· cited 17×
- DeGroot v. DeGrootDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-01-03· cited 17×
- King v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-11-19· cited 16×
- Swift v. SwiftDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-21· cited 13×
- Das v. DasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-01-14· cited 12×
- Sinha v. SinhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-12· cited 10×
- Alves v. AlvesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-10-31· cited 9×
- Garcia v. AnguloCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-15· cited 7×
- Alexander v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-02-24· cited 7×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 1,048×
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 486×
- Gilbert v. DavidSupreme Court· 1915-01-05· cited 265×
- Hauenstein v. LynhamSupreme Court· 1880-01-19· cited 223×
- Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-03-14· cited 221×
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-10-01· cited 179×
- Piedmont Cotton Mills v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1950-03-27· cited 51×
- Gosschalk v. GosschalkNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-02-06· cited 46×
- Oxley v. OxleyD.C. Circuit· 1946-12-09· cited 38×
- Gosschalk v. GosschalkSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1958-10-20· cited 35×
- Emrich v. McNeilD.C. Circuit· 1942-03-30· cited 30×
- Roberto v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Seventh Circuit· 1949-10-27· cited 27×
- Elizabeth B. Argent v. Samuel E. ArgentD.C. Circuit· 1968-05-24· cited 23×
- State ex rel. Phelps v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1907-01-24· cited 22×
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-11-04· cited 18×
- Le Bert-Francis v. Le Bert-FrancisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-11-04· cited 17×
- Elkins v. ElkinsDistrict of Columbia· 1924-05-05· cited 15×
- Heater v. HeaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-11-10· cited 14×
- Schiller v. SchillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-11-04· cited 9×
- Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1965-05-12· cited 9×
Other cases named Alves v. Alves
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.