Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Richter

Citations

  • 475 S.E.2d 817
  • 23 Va. App. 186
  • 1996 Va. App. LEXIS 599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing purpose and evolution of Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA
  • discussing purpose and evolution of Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA
  • ‘We hold that Virginia continues to have the right to enforce its own decrees even if all parties are no longer residents.”
  • \Virginia continues to have the right to enforce its own decrees even if all parties are no longer residents.\
  • order merely barred automatic withholding of child support and stayed further action; it did not determine merits of any claim or defense and did not provide for payment of monetary support
  • “[Ojnce a court ... enters a support decree with jurisdiction, it is the only body entitled to modify it so long as it retains continuing, exclusive jurisdiction under the [UIFSA].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.