Monumental Life Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one-on-one solicitation of employees from a competing company is. not “advertising”
• stating that advertising must be of a public nature, while solicitation need not be
• noting that issue is not sufficiently presented where party merely refers to argument made elsewhere, with one exception inapplicable to this case
• finding it was not advertisement where ex-employee courted a competitor’s customers with a personal solicitation that caused many of them to defect
• where brief did not contain an argument, but merely made reference to an argument contained elsewhere, argument would not be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).