Skip to main content
· 1/6/1977

Burton v. Artery Company

Citations

  • 367 A.2d 935
  • 279 Md. 94
  • 20 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1207
  • 1977 Md. LEXIS 886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “hybrid” contract involving both labor and sale of goods is governed by Maryland UCC where “the predominant factor ..., the thrust, the purpose, reasonably stated, is a transaction of sale with labor incidentally involved”
  • contract for sale and installation of trees, shrubs and sod

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Singley, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.