Dean v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where there was no direct evidence regarding probationer’s alcohol consumption, and “the only direct evidence presented was to the exact contrary,” the State failed to prove willful and substantial violation
• reversing finding of violation because, in part, probationer had ample time left in probation period to complete community service at prescribed monthly rate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-18· cited 9×
• Parker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-02· cited 7×
• Miffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-22· cited 5×
• GALEGO v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-29· cited 3×
• Marzendorfer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-24· cited 2×
• C.B.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-10· cited 2×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-30
• D.F. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowser v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-04· cited 14×
• Hines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-20· cited 13×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 11×
• Shipman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-22· cited 10×
• Pollard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-16· cited 9×
• DeJesus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-11· cited 6×
• Bales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-15· cited 4×