District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/4/2006
Bowser v. State
Citations
- 937 So. 2d 1270
- 2006 WL 2818500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that four individuals observed for twenty minutes walking the street at 2:00 a.m. looking into unoccupied vehicles in a very dark area was not sufficient to raise justifiable alarm of an immediate threat
- holding neither “possibly suspicious” eir- cumstances of appellant looking into cars in dark parking lot nor officer’s discovery upon questioning that appellant “seemed to be taking a roundabout route home” created requisite concern to establish loitering or prowling
- \The possibly suspicious circumstances of four people looking into cars in a dark parking lot was not sufficient to raise justifiable alarm of an immediate threat.\
- “possibly suspicious” circumstances of defendant looking into car windows in a dark parking lot was not sufficient to raise justifiable alarm
- \The proper standard for finding a 8 law violation is whether a preponderance of the evidence establishes that the probationer committed the charged offense.\
- neither “possibly suspicious” circumstances of appellant’s looking into cars in dark parking lot nor officer’s discovery upon questioning that appellant “seemed to be taking a roundabout route home” created requisite concern to establish loitering or prowling
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Villanti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neeld v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-26· cited 19×
- Latasia Webb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-07· cited 9×
- Simms v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-28· cited 9×
- Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-23· cited 8×
- K.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-08· cited 7×
- Stephens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-18· cited 6×
- R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-09· cited 6×
- Ferguson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-21· cited 4×
- S.K.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-17· cited 4×
- Matthews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-08· cited 3×
- Marzendorfer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-24· cited 2×
- KH v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-08
- J. J. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-12-27
- Benny Saintil v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-26
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- E.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-27· cited 27×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-10· cited 26×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-24· cited 22×
- E.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-06· cited 20×
- Von Goff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-05· cited 13×
- Oates v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 12×
- T.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-21· cited 12×
- Shipman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-22· cited 10×
- R.D.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 9×
- Eubanks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-20· cited 6×
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.