Skip to main content

Bowser v. State

Citations

  • 937 So. 2d 1270
  • 2006 WL 2818500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that four individuals observed for twenty minutes walking the street at 2:00 a.m. looking into unoccupied vehicles in a very dark area was not sufficient to raise justifiable alarm of an immediate threat
  • holding neither “possibly suspicious” eir- cumstances of appellant looking into cars in dark parking lot nor officer’s discovery upon questioning that appellant “seemed to be taking a roundabout route home” created requisite concern to establish loitering or prowling
  • \The possibly suspicious circumstances of four people looking into cars in a dark parking lot was not sufficient to raise justifiable alarm of an immediate threat.\
  • “possibly suspicious” circumstances of defendant looking into car windows in a dark parking lot was not sufficient to raise justifiable alarm
  • \The proper standard for finding a 8 law violation is whether a preponderance of the evidence establishes that the probationer committed the charged offense.\
  • neither “possibly suspicious” circumstances of appellant’s looking into cars in dark parking lot nor officer’s discovery upon questioning that appellant “seemed to be taking a roundabout route home” created requisite concern to establish loitering or prowling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Villanti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.