Miffin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court “abused its discretion” in finding violation where State presented no evidence that defendant ever received the instruction from probation officer and thus knew about the condition
• directing trial court to strike findings that defendant had violated conditions 1, 3, and 10 of probation but affirming revocation and sentences because defendant’s new law violation alone was substantial enough to warrant revocation of probation
• “We review a trial court’s revocation of probation under an abuse of discretion standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Savage v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-30· cited 46×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-23· cited 8×
• Mathis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-21· cited 4×
• C.B.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-10· cited 2×
• Middleton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-05· cited 108×
• Underwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-19· cited 13×
• Dean v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-23· cited 8×