Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n instruction that essentially imposes a new condition of probation is not 4 a routine supervisory direction and cannot support a finding that the probationer is in violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hampton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2009-02-23· cited 21×
• Ramirez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-06· cited 6×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-23· cited 2×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-24· cited 2×
• C.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-19
• Pinnock v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-12
• BRYAN FACEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-08-30
• SETH CONNER WELLS vs STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-08-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stafford v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-08-30· cited 32×
• Haynes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-18· cited 12×
• Dean v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-23· cited 8×
• Bales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-15· cited 4×
• Parissay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-03· cited 3×
• Hernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-10· cited 3×